Search us!

Search The Word Detective and our family of websites:

This is the easiest way to find a column on a particular word or phrase.

To search for a specific phrase, put it between quotation marks.






You do not need to be logged in to comment.

You can comment on any post without being registered on this site.

You do not need to use your real name (although it would be nice to do so) or your real email address.

All comments are, however, held for moderation, so it may take a day or two for yours to appear.

Almost all comments are approved (spam and personal abuse being the primary exceptions), but approval of a comment does not indicate agreement.



shameless pleading


That Goatnosed Feeling

Dear Word Detective: I recently came across the enclosed advertisement for a book called “How Not to Catch a Cold” in The New York Times Book Review. As you can see, the author feels quite strongly that the accepted derivation of the word “influenza” is wrong: “Influenza … is a corruption of the Arabic word ‘anfalanza.’ ‘Anf’ in Arabic means nose and ‘Al-anza’ means the goat. A coughing, drooling, nose-dripping goat is said to have ‘anfalanza.’ … The American Heritage Dictionary specifies the Latin ‘influentia’ meaning ‘influence’ as the origin of the word … that doesn’t make sense…. The goatnosed condition applies more firmly and believably.” What do you think? — K. Wollard, New York, NY.

Well, I think I’m not likely to buy this fellow’s book anytime soon — if his theories about colds are on a par with his theories about the word “influenza,” I’d probably be sneezing and sniffling until the turn of the century. I should note, by the way, that I’ve got a good head start already — as I type this I’m suffering from a doozie of a cold, so you might not want to get too close to the newspaper.

Our opinionated goat-fancier might find the “influence” derivation of “influenza” a bit more “believable” if he spent some time investigating why every major etymological authority finds it so convincing. “Influencia” in Medieval Latin meant more than “influence” — based on “fluere” (“to flow”), “influencia” was thought to be a fluid or emanation given off by certain stars that governed human affairs. Our modern word “disaster” comes from the same sort of ancient belief in the calamitous influence of evil (“dis”) stars (“astra”).

By the time the Latin “influencia” became the Italian word “influenza,” an “influenza” could be almost any kind of epidemic or plague blamed on the stars. Epidemics of a variety of diseases (scarlet fever, for instance) were referred to as “influenzas.” One particularly severe outbreak of the cold-like disease we now call “the flu” struck Italy in 1743 and spread throughout Europe. Known originally as “influenza di catarro” (“catarrh epidemic”), the illness came to be called simply “influenza,” as it has been ever since. And now, if you’ll excuse me, I have to pop out to the barn for a moment. I think I just heard a goat sneeze.

Leave a Reply




You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Please support
The Word Detective

(and see each issue
much sooner)

by Subscribing.


Follow us on Twitter!




New! You have questions? How Come? has the answers!

400+ pages of science questions answered and explained for kids -- and adults!