<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: June 2012 Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.word-detective.com/2012/06/june-2012-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2012/06/june-2012-issue/</link>
	<description>Semper Ubi Sub Ubi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2012/06/june-2012-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-40339</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/?p=7804#comment-40339</guid>
		<description>Given that she misunderstood the basic categories she was employing (conflating the two kinds of rules) and consequently mis-characterizing the views of people she was criticizing, yes. She was not merely missing some finer points; she was confusing the Lone Ranger with Tonto. Her review was delusional; she was writing while laboring under a fundamental misunderstanding of &quot;who, what, when, where and why.&quot; So, using &quot;grasp&quot; in the established metaphorical sense of &quot;general understanding,&quot; I think &quot;literally&quot; is appropriate.

updated: &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=2yJusP0vrdgC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=merriam+usage&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=guR7Tq3gFM7dgQeJ19zZAQ&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q=literally&amp;f=true&quot; title=&quot;Merriam-Webster&#039;s Dictionary of English Usage&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Merriam-Webster&#039;s Dictionary of English Usage on &quot;literally&quot;&lt;/a&gt; (click the first result shown)

plus &lt;a href=&quot;http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002611.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this post from Language Log&lt;/a&gt;

and, of course, &lt;a href=&quot;http://xkcd.com/725/&quot; title=&quot;Literally&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the classic xkcd.&lt;/a&gt; (not to be taken personally, of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Given that she misunderstood the basic categories she was employing (conflating the two kinds of rules) and consequently mis-characterizing the views of people she was criticizing, yes. She was not merely missing some finer points; she was confusing the Lone Ranger with Tonto. Her review was delusional; she was writing while laboring under a fundamental misunderstanding of &#8220;who, what, when, where and why.&#8221; So, using &#8220;grasp&#8221; in the established metaphorical sense of &#8220;general understanding,&#8221; I think &#8220;literally&#8221; is appropriate.</p>
<p>updated: <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=2yJusP0vrdgC&#038;printsec=frontcover&#038;dq=merriam+usage&#038;hl=en&#038;ei=guR7Tq3gFM7dgQeJ19zZAQ&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=book_result&#038;ct=result&#038;resnum=1&#038;ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&#038;q=literally&#038;f=true" title="Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Merriam-Webster&#8217;s Dictionary of English Usage on &#8220;literally&#8221;</a> (click the first result shown)</p>
<p>plus <a href="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002611.html" rel="nofollow">this post from Language Log</a></p>
<p>and, of course, <a href="http://xkcd.com/725/" title="Literally" rel="nofollow">the classic xkcd.</a> (not to be taken personally, of course).<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Lotsson</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2012/06/june-2012-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-40301</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders Lotsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/?p=7804#comment-40301</guid>
		<description>&quot; literally no grasp whatsoever&quot; - literally??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8221; literally no grasp whatsoever&#8221; &#8211; literally??<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.177 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-03-21 06:55:59 -->