<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anathema</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.word-detective.com/2011/05/anathema/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2011/05/anathema/</link>
	<description>Semper Ubi Sub Ubi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2011/05/anathema/comment-page-1/#comment-56183</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/?p=4908#comment-56183</guid>
		<description>ugh! Thanks, Shelly. I can&#039;t stand this word, despise its wrongful deployment as the only &quot;adjective-noun&quot; in the World...and you just know that people say: &quot;It was anathema to him&quot; because nobody had the patience for the &quot;Anne Elk&quot; effect of &quot;an anathema.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->ugh! Thanks, Shelly. I can&#8217;t stand this word, despise its wrongful deployment as the only &#8220;adjective-noun&#8221; in the World&#8230;and you just know that people say: &#8220;It was anathema to him&#8221; because nobody had the patience for the &#8220;Anne Elk&#8221; effect of &#8220;an anathema.&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommie miller</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2011/05/anathema/comment-page-1/#comment-41460</link>
		<dc:creator>tommie miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/?p=4908#comment-41460</guid>
		<description>&quot;Chomping at the bit&quot; instead of &quot;Champing at the bit&quot; has always driven me crazy. And yes, I have no idea why anathema is used without the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;Chomping at the bit&#8221; instead of &#8220;Champing at the bit&#8221; has always driven me crazy. And yes, I have no idea why anathema is used without the article.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2011/05/anathema/comment-page-1/#comment-41033</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/?p=4908#comment-41033</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard many people mispronounce it as an &quot;aneethma&quot;, and I have even seen it written in newspapers as an &quot;enethma&quot;, so it is confusing. Of course, I saw a newspaper print that the President said he was going to be &quot;pottering&quot; around in his back yard instead of &quot;puttering&quot; around, so I guess anything goes nowadays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;ve heard many people mispronounce it as an &#8220;aneethma&#8221;, and I have even seen it written in newspapers as an &#8220;enethma&#8221;, so it is confusing. Of course, I saw a newspaper print that the President said he was going to be &#8220;pottering&#8221; around in his back yard instead of &#8220;puttering&#8221; around, so I guess anything goes nowadays.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2011/05/anathema/comment-page-1/#comment-34531</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/?p=4908#comment-34531</guid>
		<description>I agree with both of you.  I have occasionally used the word and have noticed that I seem to be the only person using the article. In fact, I came across a website where the use of the article was apparently an anathema to the posters. I will now stick to my guns and continue to use &quot;an.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I agree with both of you.  I have occasionally used the word and have noticed that I seem to be the only person using the article. In fact, I came across a website where the use of the article was apparently an anathema to the posters. I will now stick to my guns and continue to use &#8220;an.&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirkat</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2011/05/anathema/comment-page-1/#comment-33799</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/?p=4908#comment-33799</guid>
		<description>Shelley, I agree.  &quot;Anathema&quot; without the &quot;an&quot; hurts my ears (or eyes when I&#039;m reading).   (I&#039;m also more of an &quot;a myriad of&quot; girl--i.e. &quot;a myriad of possibilities&quot; instead of &quot;myriad possibilities.&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Shelley, I agree.  &#8220;Anathema&#8221; without the &#8220;an&#8221; hurts my ears (or eyes when I&#8217;m reading).   (I&#8217;m also more of an &#8220;a myriad of&#8221; girl&#8211;i.e. &#8220;a myriad of possibilities&#8221; instead of &#8220;myriad possibilities.&#8221;)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelley</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2011/05/anathema/comment-page-1/#comment-17511</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 16:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/?p=4908#comment-17511</guid>
		<description>The use of anathema as a noun without the article has always driven me crazy. I was glad to find out that it is actually OK to use an article, so should I ever have the occasion to use the word (doesn&#039;t come up all that often for me) I plan to use &quot;an anathema&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->The use of anathema as a noun without the article has always driven me crazy. I was glad to find out that it is actually OK to use an article, so should I ever have the occasion to use the word (doesn&#8217;t come up all that often for me) I plan to use &#8220;an anathema&#8221;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.211 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-03-21 13:32:09 -->