<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gild the lily / Exception proves the rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.word-detective.com/2009/09/gild-the-lily-exception-proves-the-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/09/gild-the-lily-exception-proves-the-rule/</link>
	<description>Semper Ubi Sub Ubi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/09/gild-the-lily-exception-proves-the-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-24254</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/?p=1763#comment-24254</guid>
		<description>&quot;The exception which proves the rule&quot; continues to baffle me.  I&#039;ve heard so many explanations that I&#039;m convinced no one really knows.  I am most satisfied with the explanation that says the proper meaning is that something is such an exception to the history of a certain matter that it actually proves (tests or contests) the validity of the rule itself.   Or put a slightly different way:  the exception tests the reliability of the rule.

Although I would value your comment, I don&#039;t think it will change my mind.  My understanding of it makes more sense than any other and certainly more sense than the phrase does when it is used today in its purely nonsense application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->&#8220;The exception which proves the rule&#8221; continues to baffle me.  I&#8217;ve heard so many explanations that I&#8217;m convinced no one really knows.  I am most satisfied with the explanation that says the proper meaning is that something is such an exception to the history of a certain matter that it actually proves (tests or contests) the validity of the rule itself.   Or put a slightly different way:  the exception tests the reliability of the rule.</p>
<p>Although I would value your comment, I don&#8217;t think it will change my mind.  My understanding of it makes more sense than any other and certainly more sense than the phrase does when it is used today in its purely nonsense application.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/09/gild-the-lily-exception-proves-the-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-4811</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/?p=1763#comment-4811</guid>
		<description>Bruce and Mark, if you substitute &quot;test&quot; for &quot;proves,&quot; it does save the meaning, and bring the phrase&#039;s common usage into line with its 2nd meaning (look up Fowler), but you only need to do that at all because the phrase has been so often completely misused as nonsense (Fowler, #5)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Bruce and Mark, if you substitute &#8220;test&#8221; for &#8220;proves,&#8221; it does save the meaning, and bring the phrase&#8217;s common usage into line with its 2nd meaning (look up Fowler), but you only need to do that at all because the phrase has been so often completely misused as nonsense (Fowler, #5)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwer</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/09/gild-the-lily-exception-proves-the-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-3395</link>
		<dc:creator>rwer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/?p=1763#comment-3395</guid>
		<description>yeah ~ 
really cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->yeah ~<br />
really cool<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Welmers</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/09/gild-the-lily-exception-proves-the-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-2877</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Welmers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/?p=1763#comment-2877</guid>
		<description>When you examine a proposed rule (as in a new theorem in math) one way to find out if it is true is to look for an exception. If you find one the rule is false. This is using an exception to test the rule. That&#039;s the old meaning of the word &#039;prove&#039;. Still used in the form of the &#039;proof&#039; of alcohol. The modern translation of the old statement is &quot;The exception disproves the rule.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->When you examine a proposed rule (as in a new theorem in math) one way to find out if it is true is to look for an exception. If you find one the rule is false. This is using an exception to test the rule. That&#8217;s the old meaning of the word &#8216;prove&#8217;. Still used in the form of the &#8216;proof&#8217; of alcohol. The modern translation of the old statement is &#8220;The exception disproves the rule.&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Priest</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/09/gild-the-lily-exception-proves-the-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-2860</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Priest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/?p=1763#comment-2860</guid>
		<description>Hello, regarding &#039;the exception proves the rule&#039;, your explantion makes a lot of sense.  However, I had always thought &#039;prove&#039; in the phrase was in the sense of &#039;test&#039;, as in &#039;proving ground&#039;, &#039;proof copy&#039; etc.  What are your thoughts?
Regards,
Mark Priest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Hello, regarding &#8216;the exception proves the rule&#8217;, your explantion makes a lot of sense.  However, I had always thought &#8216;prove&#8217; in the phrase was in the sense of &#8216;test&#8217;, as in &#8216;proving ground&#8217;, &#8216;proof copy&#8217; etc.  What are your thoughts?<br />
Regards,<br />
Mark Priest<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.260 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-03-21 04:46:44 -->