<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intensive Purposes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/</link>
	<description>Semper Ubi Sub Ubi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/comment-page-1/#comment-55984</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 20:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/07/27/intensive-purposes/#comment-55984</guid>
		<description>And a &quot;Doggy Dog World&quot; is only acceptable if you are quoting Snoop-Dog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->And a &#8220;Doggy Dog World&#8221; is only acceptable if you are quoting Snoop-Dog.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/comment-page-1/#comment-55983</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 20:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/07/27/intensive-purposes/#comment-55983</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re English teacher wuzn&#039;t not wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->You&#8217;re English teacher wuzn&#8217;t not wrong.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/comment-page-1/#comment-55804</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/07/27/intensive-purposes/#comment-55804</guid>
		<description>My English teacher told me that &quot;I couldn&#039;t care less&quot; was incorrect because it is a double negative, the &#039;not&#039; and &#039;less&#039;, and although the phrase &quot;I could care less&quot; doesn&#039;t literally mean what one thinks one is saying it is still the correct version of the phrase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->My English teacher told me that &#8220;I couldn&#8217;t care less&#8221; was incorrect because it is a double negative, the &#8216;not&#8217; and &#8216;less&#8217;, and although the phrase &#8220;I could care less&#8221; doesn&#8217;t literally mean what one thinks one is saying it is still the correct version of the phrase.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Henderson</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/comment-page-1/#comment-55370</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/07/27/intensive-purposes/#comment-55370</guid>
		<description>Ouch. Not only the incorrect &quot;for all intents and purposes&quot;, but also the wrong form of &quot;its&quot;.  Another thorn in the side of any English teacher.  &quot;It&#039;s&quot; is short for &quot;it is&quot;.  The possessive form of &quot;it&quot; is &quot;its&quot; with NO apostrophe.  So, here you should use &quot;and for its purpose...??&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Ouch. Not only the incorrect &#8220;for all intents and purposes&#8221;, but also the wrong form of &#8220;its&#8221;.  Another thorn in the side of any English teacher.  &#8220;It&#8217;s&#8221; is short for &#8220;it is&#8221;.  The possessive form of &#8220;it&#8221; is &#8220;its&#8221; with NO apostrophe.  So, here you should use &#8220;and for its purpose&#8230;??&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/comment-page-1/#comment-54920</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/07/27/intensive-purposes/#comment-54920</guid>
		<description>Obviously, if we care not at all, we are at the bottom of the caring pole, so we cannot care less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Obviously, if we care not at all, we are at the bottom of the caring pole, so we cannot care less.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/comment-page-1/#comment-54919</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/07/27/intensive-purposes/#comment-54919</guid>
		<description>We repeat what we think we hear, just as someone once thought he heard &quot;I could care less&quot;, because the &quot;couldn&#039;t&quot; wasn&#039;t clearly spoken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->We repeat what we think we hear, just as someone once thought he heard &#8220;I could care less&#8221;, because the &#8220;couldn&#8217;t&#8221; wasn&#8217;t clearly spoken.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/comment-page-1/#comment-54918</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/07/27/intensive-purposes/#comment-54918</guid>
		<description>@Wanda Mahoney:
The word &quot;all&quot; is the main clue. The English language won&#039;t permit &quot;all intent&quot; any more than &quot;all person&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->@Wanda Mahoney:<br />
The word &#8220;all&#8221; is the main clue. The English language won&#8217;t permit &#8220;all intent&#8221; any more than &#8220;all person&#8221;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanda Mahoney</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/comment-page-1/#comment-36599</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanda Mahoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/07/27/intensive-purposes/#comment-36599</guid>
		<description>I thought it was &quot;for all intent and purpose&quot;   in other words what it was intended for and for it&#039;s purpose... ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I thought it was &#8220;for all intent and purpose&#8221;   in other words what it was intended for and for it&#8217;s purpose&#8230; ??<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel Bettencourt</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/comment-page-1/#comment-4016</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Bettencourt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/07/27/intensive-purposes/#comment-4016</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  My ex-wife thought it was a &quot;doggy-dog&quot; world (N of Pittsburg, c1970) and I, in my younger days (1960s, Georgia)) thought, for all intents and purposes, it was &quot;for all intensive purposes.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Interesting.  My ex-wife thought it was a &#8220;doggy-dog&#8221; world (N of Pittsburg, c1970) and I, in my younger days (1960s, Georgia)) thought, for all intents and purposes, it was &#8220;for all intensive purposes.&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beye Fyfe</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/comment-page-1/#comment-2736</link>
		<dc:creator>Beye Fyfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 00:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/07/27/intensive-purposes/#comment-2736</guid>
		<description>One of my favorits was written by a WAC who was asked on a questionnaire to comment on the food at the base where she was stationed:  &quot;The food in the mess hall is alright, but some of it is left to be desired.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->One of my favorits was written by a WAC who was asked on a questionnaire to comment on the food at the base where she was stationed:  &#8220;The food in the mess hall is alright, but some of it is left to be desired.&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cWJ</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/comment-page-1/#comment-2241</link>
		<dc:creator>cWJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/07/27/intensive-purposes/#comment-2241</guid>
		<description>See the above link, Stan. Perhaps your student performed an allusion more complex than you realize.. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->See the above link, Stan. Perhaps your student performed an allusion more complex than you realize.. ;)<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2009/01/intensive-purposes/comment-page-1/#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/07/27/intensive-purposes/#comment-1476</guid>
		<description>a student once wrote: it&#039;s a doggy dog world.
ranks right up there with &quot;for all intensive purposes&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->a student once wrote: it&#8217;s a doggy dog world.<br />
ranks right up there with &#8220;for all intensive purposes&#8221;!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.282 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-03-21 06:24:35 -->