<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dead to rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/</link>
	<description>Semper Ubi Sub Ubi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: harvey</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-43021</link>
		<dc:creator>harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/11/dead-to-rights/#comment-43021</guid>
		<description>In many a Louis L&#039;Amour western either a good guy or a bad guy could be caught &quot;dead to rights.&quot;  My interpretation is that someone is a dead duck, with only the whim of the shooter determining if he will pull the trigger and kill the shootee!  In these stories there are several scenarios: the potential shootee drops his pistol [as in the sheriff had him dead to rights...so I dropped my pistol]; or the shootee realizes his predicament but is too tough to go out peaceably...so he ends up sprawled in the dust with a crimson spot spreading  on his shirt/vest/jacket from a bullet in the chest/arm/leg/etc.  Or, it could be that someone was caught in the act of theft: he knew it/they knew it/she knew it...and someone could or might call the sheriff; escape from the scene would be possible but escape from the crime would not be possible.  Anyhow, this is my contribution to this discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->In many a Louis L&#8217;Amour western either a good guy or a bad guy could be caught &#8220;dead to rights.&#8221;  My interpretation is that someone is a dead duck, with only the whim of the shooter determining if he will pull the trigger and kill the shootee!  In these stories there are several scenarios: the potential shootee drops his pistol [as in the sheriff had him dead to rights...so I dropped my pistol]; or the shootee realizes his predicament but is too tough to go out peaceably&#8230;so he ends up sprawled in the dust with a crimson spot spreading  on his shirt/vest/jacket from a bullet in the chest/arm/leg/etc.  Or, it could be that someone was caught in the act of theft: he knew it/they knew it/she knew it&#8230;and someone could or might call the sheriff; escape from the scene would be possible but escape from the crime would not be possible.  Anyhow, this is my contribution to this discussion.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanielVincentKelleyOnYT</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-39220</link>
		<dc:creator>DanielVincentKelleyOnYT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 19:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/11/dead-to-rights/#comment-39220</guid>
		<description>Matt got it exactly right. The author of this nonsense is wholly wrong. Dead to rights means, the person is no longer eligible for rights. Rights as voting, gun ownership and freedom, disappear upon conviction. That this was cop slang speaks to the cop mentality being their presumptuous ability to revoke rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Matt got it exactly right. The author of this nonsense is wholly wrong. Dead to rights means, the person is no longer eligible for rights. Rights as voting, gun ownership and freedom, disappear upon conviction. That this was cop slang speaks to the cop mentality being their presumptuous ability to revoke rights.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevon</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-28395</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/11/dead-to-rights/#comment-28395</guid>
		<description>You can always tell an expert! Thanks for cotnirbuting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->You can always tell an expert! Thanks for cotnirbuting.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Sid</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-27790</link>
		<dc:creator>El Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/11/dead-to-rights/#comment-27790</guid>
		<description>This could be an example of US usage being fossilised whilst British usage has evolved. These days a Brit would normally say &quot;bang to rights&quot; rather than &quot;dead to rights&quot;, even if the latter is the phrase with the longer history.

I must admit, that to these British ears, TWD&#039;s line seems most plausible. The average medieval lynch mob didn&#039;t care too much about rights of appeal, but the circumstances of arrest did matter quite a bit, it was important to do it correctly. The ship theory is just fanciful, the religious theories forget that in that context it is spelt &quot;rites&quot;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->This could be an example of US usage being fossilised whilst British usage has evolved. These days a Brit would normally say &#8220;bang to rights&#8221; rather than &#8220;dead to rights&#8221;, even if the latter is the phrase with the longer history.</p>
<p>I must admit, that to these British ears, TWD&#8217;s line seems most plausible. The average medieval lynch mob didn&#8217;t care too much about rights of appeal, but the circumstances of arrest did matter quite a bit, it was important to do it correctly. The ship theory is just fanciful, the religious theories forget that in that context it is spelt &#8220;rites&#8221;&#8230;.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignatian-Mystic</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-27631</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignatian-Mystic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/11/dead-to-rights/#comment-27631</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think that the interpretations given by T.W.D., Matt, and some of the others could all be applied to the phrase in different situations. Whatever floats your boat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Personally, I think that the interpretations given by T.W.D., Matt, and some of the others could all be applied to the phrase in different situations. Whatever floats your boat.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-27574</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/11/dead-to-rights/#comment-27574</guid>
		<description>I think it comes from the Catholic &quot;Last Rights&quot;, &quot;dead to Rights&quot; simply referes to be dead, after last rights...

Where one&#039;s last rights are no longer availible...After death, you are judged, you cannot repent...

Odd little quirky Catholic phrase which has been popularized by repetition....

You won&#039;t hear me use it, I am not Catholic...

:-p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I think it comes from the Catholic &#8220;Last Rights&#8221;, &#8220;dead to Rights&#8221; simply referes to be dead, after last rights&#8230;</p>
<p>Where one&#8217;s last rights are no longer availible&#8230;After death, you are judged, you cannot repent&#8230;</p>
<p>Odd little quirky Catholic phrase which has been popularized by repetition&#8230;.</p>
<p>You won&#8217;t hear me use it, I am not Catholic&#8230;</p>
<p>:-p<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobH007</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-18491</link>
		<dc:creator>BobH007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 14:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/11/dead-to-rights/#comment-18491</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard the term used mostly in a law enforcement concept, but wondered if it didn&#039;t date back to the sea-faring days when an attacking ship had the victim ship perpendicular to its path, able to fire a broadside of cannon. That would be at &#039;right&#039; angle and the vessel receiving the fire &#039;dead to rights.&#039; It certainly has a more romantic connotation for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;ve heard the term used mostly in a law enforcement concept, but wondered if it didn&#8217;t date back to the sea-faring days when an attacking ship had the victim ship perpendicular to its path, able to fire a broadside of cannon. That would be at &#8216;right&#8217; angle and the vessel receiving the fire &#8216;dead to rights.&#8217; It certainly has a more romantic connotation for me.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interlineal P.E.Ruser _ P.robable E.rror</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-11556</link>
		<dc:creator>Interlineal P.E.Ruser _ P.robable E.rror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/11/dead-to-rights/#comment-11556</guid>
		<description>I dunno about &#039;dead to rights/rites&#039; but I&#039;m &#039;read to diets&#039;! Food for thought?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I dunno about &#8216;dead to rights/rites&#8217; but I&#8217;m &#8216;read to diets&#8217;! Food for thought?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris collingsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-7761</link>
		<dc:creator>chris collingsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/11/dead-to-rights/#comment-7761</guid>
		<description>Duh, I can&#039;t stop using this phrase during sunday night football. Maybe now I understand the true meaning, I&#039;ll stop. I&#039;m a lawyer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Duh, I can&#8217;t stop using this phrase during sunday night football. Maybe now I understand the true meaning, I&#8217;ll stop. I&#8217;m a lawyer!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KY HOLE</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-5907</link>
		<dc:creator>KY HOLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/11/dead-to-rights/#comment-5907</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with G S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I&#8217;m with G S.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-4192</link>
		<dc:creator>W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/11/dead-to-rights/#comment-4192</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how I stumbled upon this forum, but the expression &quot;dead to rights&quot; is also used by people in Law Enforcement.  My cousin told me a story about his SWAT experiences of approaching a front door and a man was hiding behind stuff with a gun pointed right at him, and that guy had him &quot;dead to rights&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I don&#8217;t know how I stumbled upon this forum, but the expression &#8220;dead to rights&#8221; is also used by people in Law Enforcement.  My cousin told me a story about his SWAT experiences of approaching a front door and a man was hiding behind stuff with a gun pointed right at him, and that guy had him &#8220;dead to rights&#8221;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/dead-to-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-4012</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.word-detective.com/2008/04/11/dead-to-rights/#comment-4012</guid>
		<description>Steve is funny and G S is so right about the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Steve is funny and G S is so right about the comments.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.298 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-03-21 02:36:08 -->