Search us!
Search The Word Detective and our family of websites:
This is the easiest way to find a column on a particular word or phrase.
To search for a specific phrase, put it between quotation marks.
Please help keep The Word Detective online by contributing
via PayPal.
Ask a Question! Puzzled by Posh?
Confounded by Cattycorner?
Baffled by Balderdash?
Flummoxed by Flabbergast?
Perplexed by Pandemonium?
Nonplussed by... Nonplussed?
Annoyed by Alliteration?
Don't be shy! Send in your question!
 
If you would like to be notified when each monthly update is posted here, sign up for our free Topica email notification list.
 
 
Trivia
All contents herein (except the illustrations, which are in the public domain) are Copyright © 1995-2008 Evan Morris. Reproduction without written permission is prohibited, with the exception that teachers in public schools may duplicate and distribute the material here for classroom use.
Any typos found are yours to keep.
And remember, kids,
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Subscribe to The Word Detective on Kindle!
Read it in your flying car!
|
On the hook.
Dear Word Detective: Being a sport fisherman, I occasionally refer to myself (and others I respect as serious fishermen) as an “angler.” It has recently come to my attention that I have no idea why “angler” means “fisherman.” I have read that the word “angle” (or “angel”) simply means “fish hook” thus defining those who use them as “anglers.” However, I have also heard that the term “angler” comes from the angle between the line and rod. I’m sure there’s more to the story — can you shed some light on it? — Jeff.
Hmm. Is there a gender-neutral alternative to “fisherman”? I’m not an extremist in such matters, but “Cynthia is a crackerjack fisherman” really doesn’t sound right. Simply “fisher” won’t work as a substitute because it’s such a common surname folks might assume you’re talking about the family down the block (”The Fishers caught flounders, but Larry just caught a cold”). “Fisherperson” gives me the fantods. Hey, I know. We’ll call them “anglers.” That was easy.
“Angler” has been used to mean “one who fishes with a hook and line” since the mid-16th century, and is based on the verb “to angle,” which has meant “to fish” since the late 15th century. This verb “to angle” is based on the noun “angle,” meaning “hook for fishing,” which is now considered archaic but was in use until the 19th century. It is true that this “angle” was spelled “angel” in Old English, but it is unrelated to the Biblical sort of “angel” (which is based on a Greek word for “messenger”). This now-obsolete noun “angle” was based on a Indo-European root (”ank”) meaning “to bend” (which also gave us “ankle” and “anchor”), and was often used to refer to the rod and line as well as the hook. But “angler” has nothing to do with the “angle” between one’s line and rod. That’s an entirely different kind of “angle.”
This second noun “angle” is the one in common use today, meaning “the relation of one line to another at their intersection,” usually measured in degrees. This “angle” is derived from the Latin “angulum,” meaning “corner,” but if you go far back enough, you run into our old friend, the Indo-European root “ank.” So the two “angle” nouns are cousins, but are still considered separate words because they followed different paths into English.
Two figurative uses of “angle” illustrate, however, how close the two words are in practical use. The verb “to angle,” in an extension of its meaning “to fish,” has long been used to mean “to use subtle or devious means to obtain something,” as in “Bob is angling for a promotion” or “I think Tim was angling for a compliment on his cooking.” Similarly, we use the noun “angle” as slang to mean “scheme” or “devious plan” (invoking the sense of an “angle of attack”), as in “Lefty’s always looking for an angle to fleece the tourists,” as well as, more innocently, “perspective” or “approach” (”I didn’t agree with the angle the reporter took on that story”).

readme:
Well, here we go again. This issue marks the return of strange headlines and even stranger illustrations to the columns.
We are still in the process of integrating the old archives into this new site, so if you’re looking for something and can’t find it in the “New Archives” at left, check the “Old Archives” link a bit further down. If all else fails, the Google search box at the foot of each page works on the sledgehammer principle, searching everything on both sites. If you still can’t find the answer, it probably isn’t here, and you should send me a question.
A special thanks to all the folks who have chipped in moolah lately, especially subscribers who renewed their subscriptions. Your premium cats are in the mail. But seriously, we here at TWD World Headquarters depend on the kindness of our readers to support this site, so please consider subscribing to TWD-by-Email. You’ll still be able to come back here, see the illustrations, and post your comments on the columns.
And if you run out of things to read here, swing by Ask for It by Name!, which is just getting started but already explains the origins of many of your favorite brand names. Mmmm, Chef Boyardee.
Update: There’s something new at the bottom of every page of this site: a customized Google Word Origins search engine which will search a range of credible English etymology websites (which I picked) for any word or phrase entered in the box. It sure beats searching the entire web for something if you can’t find it here.
Give it a shot:
And now, on with the show….
Cross at the green, not in betw…
Dear Word Detective: What is the origin of the phrase “to throw one under the bus”? — Brenda Varney.

Good question, and, it would seem, a timely one as well. It’s hard to pick up a newspaper or turn on the TV these days without hearing of someone being “thrown under the bus.” Last year CNN’s Jack Cafferty declared that “Rather than face Senate confirmation hearings over his reappointment as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Bush White House has decided to simply throw General Peter Pace under the bus.” Elsewhere, the E-Commerce News warned that a new song royalty scheme would “… throw large webcasters under the bus and put an end to small webcasters’ hopes of one day becoming big.” And a letter to the New York Times cautioned the paper not to “throw doctors under the bus … as the cause of health care costs.”
“To throw someone under the bus” is defined as meaning “to sacrifice; to treat as a scapegoat; to betray,” but I think the key to the phrase really lies in the element of utter betrayal, the sudden, brutal sacrifice of a stalwart and loyal teammate for a temporary and often minor advantage. There is no retirement dinner, no gold watch, for poor schmuck “thrown under the bus.” On the contrary, the scapegoat’s name is liable to disappear from the website overnight.
The earliest solid example of “throw under the bus” found in print so far is from 1991, although a 1984 quote from rock star Cyndi Lauper where she uses the phrase “under the bus” (without “throw”) may or may not count as a sighting. Incidentally, by far the best compilation of citations for the phrase can be found, as usual, at Grant Barrett’s Double-Tongued Dictionary website (www.doubletongued.org).
The exact origin of “thrown under the bus” is, unfortunately, a mystery. Slang expert Paul Dickson, quoted by William Safire in his New York Times magazine column, traces it to sports, specifically the standard announcement by managers trying to get the players to board the team bus: “Bus leaving. Be on it or under it.” The phrase does seem to be popular in sports circles, but few of the citations I have seen from sports publications carry the same overtones of casual, callous betrayal that one finds in non-sporting uses.
Consequently, I have my own theory. I don’t think the “bus” was ever the team bus. As someone who spent a lot of time standing on Manhattan street corners and narrowly avoided being expunged by speeding city buses on several occasions, to me the phrase conjures up the classic urban nightmare of being pushed in front of a bus. As a way to quickly and irreversibly get rid of someone, “throwing” them under a bus in this sense would be the ideal solution and would satisfy the connotations of sudden, cold brutality the phrase usually carries. So I suspect that the phrase has urban origins, and migrated into sports world via players from big cities.
|
Sideblog An annex to this site for parking odds and ends, news about words & language, and general weirdness you might enjoy.
Visit the Sideblog!
Visit our other TWD websites!
And don't forget to visit
How Come?
for answers to the science questions you've always wondered about.
Ask a question, win a book!
|
Recent Comments