<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Haphazard.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.word-detective.com/2007/06/haphazard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2007/06/haphazard/</link>
	<description>Semper Ubi Sub Ubi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher E.</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2007/06/haphazard/comment-page-1/#comment-4638</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://word-detective.com/wordpress/?p=92#comment-4638</guid>
		<description>I wonder if there is any connection between &quot;happ&quot; and the legal term &quot;hap&quot;, meaning to get or snatch or obtain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I wonder if there is any connection between &#8220;happ&#8221; and the legal term &#8220;hap&#8221;, meaning to get or snatch or obtain.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Nalder</title>
		<link>http://www.word-detective.com/2007/06/haphazard/comment-page-1/#comment-4096</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nalder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://word-detective.com/wordpress/?p=92#comment-4096</guid>
		<description>May I add to your heaps on haps and hazards:

On the latter there is the shy phrase TO PUT(or SET)AT HAZARD; I say &#039;shy&#039; because it rarely shows its face nowadays. But I like it nonetheless.

And on the former, equally demure, there are HAPLESS and MAYHAP, and I particularly like the north England dialect form &#039;APPEN as in &quot;&#039;appen you&#039;ll be at t&#039; pub tonight?&quot;. Rising inflexion at the end rather then anything else establishes that it&#039;s a question. Here HAPPEN is really &#039;maybe&#039; but in my made-up question it becomes almost an auxiliary verb rather than adverb:  It&#039;s certainly not the verb &#039;to happen&#039; in this context. Compare it with &quot;Will you be ...&quot; or, to link it with its origin, &quot;Is here a chance you&#039;ll be ...&quot;

The charm of words enchants as ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->May I add to your heaps on haps and hazards:</p>
<p>On the latter there is the shy phrase TO PUT(or SET)AT HAZARD; I say &#8216;shy&#8217; because it rarely shows its face nowadays. But I like it nonetheless.</p>
<p>And on the former, equally demure, there are HAPLESS and MAYHAP, and I particularly like the north England dialect form &#8216;APPEN as in &#8220;&#8216;appen you&#8217;ll be at t&#8217; pub tonight?&#8221;. Rising inflexion at the end rather then anything else establishes that it&#8217;s a question. Here HAPPEN is really &#8216;maybe&#8217; but in my made-up question it becomes almost an auxiliary verb rather than adverb:  It&#8217;s certainly not the verb &#8216;to happen&#8217; in this context. Compare it with &#8220;Will you be &#8230;&#8221; or, to link it with its origin, &#8220;Is here a chance you&#8217;ll be &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>The charm of words enchants as ever.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.196 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-03-21 05:24:54 -->